Continuing Ed: Review of Radiopharmaceutical Use in Medicine


By: Jennifer Gutiérrez, BS, CNMT, RT(N)(CT)

Radioisotopes, also known as radionuclides and radioactive isotopes, are used in both therapeutic and diagnostic applications in the medical field. According to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, approximately a third of all patients in the U.S. admitted to hospitals will be diagnosed or treated using radioisotopes. A radionuclide is an unstable isotope with excess energy that is released in the form of radioactive decay. Radioisotopes will vary in characteristics such as energy, decay mode, and half-life.

Isotope Production

Radioisotopes used in medicine are created in various ways.  Nuclear reactors, cyclotrons (a particle accelerator), and nuclear generators are all used in the production of radioisotopes. 

Nuclear reactors are responsible for producing radioisotopes such as thallium-201 (Tl- 201), molybdenum-99 (Mb-99), iodine-131 (I-131), strontium-89 (Sr-89), yttrium-90 (Y 90), and xenon-133 (Xe-133). In radioisotope production via nuclear reactors, nuclear transmutation takes place when atoms of elements introduced into the reactor take on additional neutrons, made possible by a high neutron flux in the reactor.

Cyclotrons are responsible for producing radioisotopes such as fluorine-18 (F-18), oxygen-15 (O-15), indium-111 (In-111), iodine-123 (I-123) and rubidium-82 (Rb-82). Tl- 201 can also be produced in a cyclotron. A cyclotron is a type of particle accelerator. In radioisotope production via a cyclotron, atoms are bombarded with protons accelerated via a vacuum chamber, a magnetic target, and the application of alternating voltage across electrodes. Cyclotrons can be found in hospitals and nuclear pharmacies.

Radioisotope generators are most commonly used to produce technetium-99 (Tc- 99m). This radioisotope is the most widely used for nuclear medicine applications. A generator consists of a parent isotope, which naturally decays to a daughter isotope. The parent isotope is usually a long-lived isotope (an isotope having a long half-life) and the daughter isotope is a short-lived isotope (having a short half-life). For Tc-99m, the parent isotope is molybdenum-99 (Mb-99). A generator can be kept at a hospital and chemical elution will extract the Tc-99m from the column to be used for medical purposes.

Uses of radioactive materials in medicine

The characteristic of radioactive decay is what makes radioisotopes useful in their medical applications; however, different applications will take advantage of radioactive emissions in different ways. Radioactive materials are regularly used to treat medical conditions, diagnosis pathology, visualize and measure physiological functions, and localize structures and pathways. The following sections serve as an outline and review of various uses of radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear medicine, but are not intended to be a comprehensive collection of all indications and uses.

Continue reading

Posted in Continuing Education Category A | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Benefits of gamma camera rentals: from start-up assistance to interim solutions to keep your practice running smoothly

Who can benefit from nuclear gamma camera rentals?

Imaging Startups

Imaging companies in the early stages of their business may not have the history of income necessary to secure a loan or lease for imaging equipment; camera rentals are a great alternative to camera leasing, with month-to-month agreements and without many of the qualifications necessary for loan agreements.

Startups are not always sure if they’ll be able to acquire the patient flow to be viable; Camera rentals can limit this risk with not long-term lease to worry about.

Startups can use a camera rental agreement as an opportunity to build equity through regular monthly rental payments.

Existing Sites wanting to expand

Imaging centers with a plan to expand their practices could find renting a camera as opposed to purchasing or leasing one, will allow them to mitigate risk and assess patient volume without making any long-term commitments. Imaging centers may also find a camera rental option better for their expansion plans due to less financial qualifications required as opposed to leases and loans, and still have the opportunity to build equity in their equipment through their monthly payments.

Imaging Centers in need of a temporary camera

Imaging centers in the middle of a move will benefit from a flexible rental agreement and compact camera options if they are confined to a smaller area In the midst of construction. This allows centers to maintain a scanning schedule even when their permanent imaging rooms are unavailable.

Imaging centers waiting for a new camera delivery can utilize a camera rental if when their site and staff are ready, This way centers can begin patient scanning whenever they’re ready, and won’t have to worry about unexpected delays due to delivery and installation of the new equipment. Continue reading

Posted in Company Updates, Industry Updates | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Planning for the Eventual: Keeping medical information secure in the handheld world

By Paul Dow, MS, RT(R)(CT)

Personal mobile devices such as smart phones and tablet computers are becoming more popular among clinicians as they look for ways to improve their daily delivery of healthcare. These devices have increasingly powerful processors and larger hard drive capacities which can be an asset when interacting with large image data sets. However, there are risks for organizations and individuals who use these devices if they are lost or stolen and there is protected health information (PHI) stored within the device. A little preparation by an organization before a loss occurs can possibly limit the scope of the damage, or at least provide a starting place for recovering from the initial shock of the event.

Continue reading

Posted in Clinical Informatics, Industry Updates | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Survey on Radiology Technologist job market blames imaging schools over economy

We asked 135 radiology professionals their opinions on the current job market for radiology technologists, and they sure did have a lot to say: 4,087 words to be exact. This issue is weighing heavy on the profession, and seems to be cultivating some pretty strong opinions about the politics involved in imaging schools and accreditation bodies. 53% of our survey participants attributed the main cause of job shortages in the profession to imaging schools accepting too many students per class. 17% of participants blamed the economy, and 10% identified technologists working to a later retirement age as the main cause.

According to the latest ASRT survey, the vacancy rates for all imaging modalities have dropped significantly since 2003. The modality seeing the biggest hit is Cardiovascular Intervention, dropping 11.1%, and Nuclear Medicine close behind dropping 9.5%. Our survey participants identified Radiography and Nuclear Medicine as the modalities in the lowest demand (43% and 35% respectively), while 41% felt Sonography was in the highest demand.

The statistic that speaks the loudest to the current job climate for RTs and CNMTs is that 57% of those surveyed knew more than 5 technologists that were either unemployed, or employed with limited/decreased hours, due to the inability to find work. Overall, 94% identified knowing at least 1 technologist (including themselves) that could not find full-time work in their field. While some professionals attribute this to the overall reduction in work due to the economy, others argue that this statistic of unemployment is too high to blame entirely on budget cuts.

Continue reading

Posted in Career, Industry Updates, Nuclear Medicine, Technologists | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Continuing Ed: Lung Cancer: Disease, Diagnosis, and Treatment

By: Jennifer Gutiérrez, BS, CNMT, RT(N)(CT)

Definition: Lung cancer, a malignancy of the lungs, is defined as an uncontrolled growth of abnormal cells in one or more of the lungs.

Etiology

Over 165,000 people die of lung cancer every year in the United States. Lung cancer composes 28% of all cancer deaths in the United States. It is the leading cause of cancer deaths in men and women in the United States and worldwide.

The median age of patients receiving a lung cancer diagnosis is 70 years.

Smoking is the chief risk factor of lung cancer with over 85% of lung cancers attributed to smoking. Female smokers are at a higher risk (approximately twice as likely to develop lung cancer) than male smokers, although there are not yet any clinical indicators as to why. 

Other risk factors for lung cancer include: second-hand smoke, a family history of cancer, radiation exposure, asbestos exposure (asbestos workers are seven times more likely to develop lung cancers than non-asbestos workers), air pollution, and exposure to radon, uranium, arsenic, coal products, nickel chromates, gasoline, and diesel exhaust.

Types of lung cancer

The two most common types of lung cancer are Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) and
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).
 Each type of lung cancer has different behaviors and clinical patterns, is composed of different types of cells, and responds to different types of treatments. Clinical staging also differs among different types of lung cancer.

Small cell lung cancer: Small cell lung cancer, also called oat cell carcinoma and small cell undifferentiated carcinoma, accounts for approximately 20% of all lung cancer cases. SCLC is characterized by an aggressive clinical pattern involving distinct cells that grow and metastasize more rapidly than those involved in other types of lung cancer. In addition to rapid growth, the cancer cells involved with SCLC are also more sensitive to chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Surgery is rarely used in this type of treatment due to the rapid onset of SCLC, its likelihood of spreading to organs outside of the lungs, and its sensitivity to other treatments. SCLC is highly associated with smoking.

Non-small cell lung cancer: Non-small cell lung cancer composes approximately 75% of all lung cancers. Although surgery is the preferred treatment for NSCLC, most patients are diagnosed too late for surgery to be effective.

Like there are different types of lung cancer, there are also different types of NSCLC,
depending on the type of tumor existing in each case. Each carcinoma group arises in a distinct part of the lungs, varies in cell size/shape, and/or varies in treatment options. When localized, all groups have a potential of cure with surgical resection.

Adenocarcinoma: Adenocarcinoma is the most common type of lung cancer and composes approximately 40% of all lung cancers. This type of lung cancer has no relationship with smoking. It originates on the outer boundaries of the lungs.

Squamous cell carcinoma: Squamous cell carcinoma, also called Epidermoid cancer, is the
second most common lung cancer. It composes approximately 20-30% of all lung
 cancers. Squamous cell carcinoma usually originates in the bronchial tubes and the bronchial epithelium. Squamous cell carcinoma spreads locally and later metastasizes throughout the body.

Large cell carcinoma: Large cell carcinoma composes approximately 10% of all lung cancers. This type of cancer is composed of large, abnormal cells and beings along the outer edges of the lungs.

Secondary Lung Cancer: Secondary lung cancer is a malignancy of the lung that has spread from other parts of the body (where lung is not the area of primary cancer). Secondary lung cancer does not have the same characteristics or clinical pattern as primary lung cancers and is not treated or stages as such.

Clinical manifestations

Symptoms:  Symptoms of lung cancer that may present while lung cancer is still localized to the lung area are: persistent cough, loss of appetite, weight loss, shortness of breath, blood in phlegm, and recurring respiratory infections. Symptoms that may occur after metastases include: bone pain, jaundice, dizziness, swelling of the neck or face, headaches, neurological changes, and palpable masses near the skin. Unfortunately, once these symptoms present themselves, cancer has usually spread a substantial amount and prognosis is not good. The time of onset to manifestations varies and depends on the type of cancer as well as the location.

Lung nodules can be detected on chest x-rays (routine physical examinations and
pre-operative testing) before clinical manifestations occur. Screening may occur after certain symptoms present themselves, or as a routine screening due to risk factors. Many nodules found on x-rays and during lung cancer screening are benign. Currently, it is difficult to assess the possible malignancy of such nodules, as further assessment tends to be costly and/or invasive (this is discussed in the Diagnosis, monitoring & staging procedures section of this article).

Most cancers of the lung (if not detected when still localized) will be fatal within 5 years.

Diagnosis, monitoring, & staging procedures

Physical exam: a physical exam could detect certain symptoms that are sometimes present in lung cancer, such as breathing difficulties, infection in the lungs, or obstruction of the airway.

Sputum cytology: mucous cells (expectorant from the patient) are examined under a microscope to determine if cancerous cells are present.

Biopsy: a sample of tissue or fluid is removed from the patient for examination under a microscope to determine if cancerous cells are present.

Chest x-ray: when respiratory symptoms present themselves, a chest x-ray is the most commonly performed test to evaluate anatomy for abnormalities. Images from the anterior to the posterior are usually taken, as well as lateral images. Not all abnormalities on a chest x-ray will indicate a malignancy, and not all malignancies can be detected from a chest x-ray. If an abnormality is detected on a chest x-ray, further means of lung cancer screening/assessment may be suggested. Most commonly used ways to assess the malignancy of a nodule can be costly (PET or PET/CT imaging) or invasive (biopsy).  

Bronchoscopy: an instrument called a bronchoscope is inserted into the mouth or nose of the patient and allows the doctor to examine the cells and anatomy of the airways and lungs; the doctor can also collect tissue to biopsy using the bronchoscope; some bronchoscopes have video recording devices incorporated into the instrument so the examination can be replayed and analyzed.

Needle aspiration: a needle is inserted through the chest and into the tumor to remove tumor cells for pathological evaluation.

Thoracentesis: a needle is inserted through the chest into the cavity surrounding the lungs and fluid is removed for pathological evaluation.

CT: computerized tomography may be indicated when no abnormalities are found on an x-ray, or when it is necessary to visualize an abnormality in more detail. CT scans take
x-ray images from multiple angles and anatomy can be viewed in 3 planes. CT
scans may also be indicated to assess other parts of the body for metastatic
disease.

MRI: magnetic resonance imaging can be used to visualize detailed anatomy of the lungs and bordering structures and may be indicated when an x-ray has not shown an
abnormality or failed to show necessary detail. More detailed images can be obtained using MRI imaging than chest x-ray, and images can be viewed in 3 planes. MRI shows superior contrast between soft tissues than other imaging procedures such as CT and x-ray. Unlike CT and x-ray, MRI does not use ionizing radiation.

Nuclear bone scanthis imaging is used to detect if lung cancer has spread to the bones, or if it remains in the bones after treatment. A radioisotope attached to a phosphate analogue is injected into the patient’s blood stream and whole-body images are taken using a gamma camera. In areas of increased bone metabolism, the phosphate analogue will accumulate, thereby emitting more radiation than normal bone. The gamma camera detectors will image the bones and the radioactive activity and indicate high levels of bone metabolism, often times an indicator of metastatic activity.

PET: positron emission tomography is used to stage disease and monitor disease progression and effectiveness of treatment. A positron-emitting radioisotope is attached to a glucose molecule and injected into the patient’s blood stream. The glucose molecule will localize in increased areas of metabolic activity, such as tumors. A PET scanner detects the radiation present throughout the body and creates images in 3 planes of the body. Unlike X-ray, MRI and CT, PET images the physiology of the body rather than the anatomy. When used in detection of mediastinal metastasis, PET sensitivity and specificity are found to be higher than that of CT.

PET/CT: when PET and CT are used togethera hybrid camera is used to image both physiology and the anatomy. The detail and high resolution provided by CT is fused with
the metabolic information gathered by the PET to detect not only the size and exact location of abnormalities, but their metabolic activity (malignancy) as
well.

Blood tests: blood tests can be helpful in staging previously diagnosed cancers, or can be an indicator of a possible malignancy. Certain enzymes may exist in the blood, such as
alkaline phosphatase, that can indicate bone metastasis. Elevated calcium levels could also be an indication of bone metastasis. Elevated levels of enzymes found in liver cells, such as alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), could signal liver disease, and possible malignancy of/metastasis to the liver.

Tumor markers, also called biomarkers, are substances that are sometimes found in a specific concentration in the blood (as well as other body fluids or tissues) that may indicate a certain type of cancer is present in the body. Blood is drawn from the patient and tested for biomarkers specific to lung cancer. Researchers have discovered over 400 biomarkers associated with lung cancer to date. Assessment of biomarkers can be used for early detection, as well as treatment selection and monitoring of disease. A recent study has found an abnormal structure of micro RNA (miRNA) to be present in lung cancer patients. The study also found this biomarker to be present in patients before CT scans were able to detect lung nodules in the patients.

Disease progression

Lung cancer will always originate in the lung, and can remain localized without any symptoms presenting. The most common disease progression is as follows:

·      local tumor(s) exists in the lung

·      invasion of airways and blood vessels by tumor(s)

·      primary symptoms may appear

·      malignancy spreads to the lymph nodes

·      lung cancer metastasizes throughout the body (most often to the liver, adrenal glands, bones and brain)

·      advanced symptoms may appear

 

Staging

Staging is an attempt to define the true extent of a cancer in each patient based on the extent of the primary tumor and the presence or absence of lymphatic involvement or distant metastases. Treatment and prognosis rely on accurate staging for effectiveness
and accuracy.

Staging SCLC: There are two classifications in the staging of SCLC: limited and extensive. A staging classification of limited stage (LS) signifies that disease is confined to the chest, with involvement of only one lung and one nearby lymph node. Any further progression of disease (the disease has spread to other organs) is classified as extensive stage (ES).

Staging NSCLC: NSCLC is staged using roman numerals I-IV, as well as a Stage 0, each having a specific definition indicating the progression of the disease and anatomy involved0 indicates local cancer (cancer is in situ) while IV indicates cancer outside of the chest. The
chart below outlines the different stages of NSCLC and survival rates associated with each.

 

 

Roman Numeral
Staging

0

disease limited to air passage lining: has not invaded lung tissue; can usually be treated and eliminated when diagnosed in this stage

I

disease limited to lung tissue; has not yet invaded lymph nodes or other organs; 60-80% chance of survival at 5 years if treated at this stage

II

disease has invaded nearby lymph nodes or has spread to the chest wall; 40-50% chance of survival at 5 years if treated at this stage.

IIIA

disease has invaded lymph nodes outside of the lung area; surgery is usually ruled out as a course of treatment; 15-30% chance of survival at 5 years if treated at this stage

IIIB

disease has invaded organs and structures surrounding the lungs such as the heart, trachea, and esophagus; disease still confined to the chest area; surgery is not a treatment option; 10-15% chance of survival if treated at this stage

IV

disease has invaded structures and organs throughout the body, such as liver, bones, and brain; less than 2% chance of survival at 5 years if treated at this stage

 

Treatment regimes

Which treatment or combination of treatments is used is determined by the stage of
the cancer, as well as the patient’s overall health. In earlier stages of lung cancer, surgery may be successful in removal of the malignancy. When the lung cancer has metastasized to a more advanced stage, surgery may no longer be an option.

NSCLC stages 0 – I are usually treated with surgery, while stage II cancers will oftentimes
be treated with surgery followed by chemotherapy or radiation therapy. NSCLC stages III and IV will usually use a combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy, as the disease is too widespread to surgically remove the malignancy with positive results.

SCLC in limited stage may be treatable with surgery, although it is extremely rare for
SCLC to be diagnosed at that stage. Chemotherapy is the most commonly the main
treatment for SCLC, while it can be combined with other treatments as well.  

Surgery: Surgery is used to remove malignancies that are confined to a defined area of the lung anatomy. In most cases, surgery is performed to remove a malignancy before it can metastasize throughout the body. Often times lymph nodes surrounding the area of the malignancy are also removed as a precautionary measure, or if a biopsy has shown lymph node involvement. Surgery may not be an option for certain patients who are not healthy enough to undergo the physical demands of such an intensive mediastinal procedure.

Segmentectemoy/wedge resection: removal of small segments or wedges of the lung

Lobectomy: removal of a lobe of the lung

Pneumonectomy: removal of a lung

Lymph node removal: removal of lymph nodes surrounding the malignancy

Chemotherapy: Chemotherapy is the use of cytotoxic, or cell-killing, drugs to kill cancerous cells in the body, or to decrease their activity. Chemotherapy differs from surgery and radiation therapy in that it is a systemic treatment, targeting cancer cells throughout the entire body. Chemotherapy is often times used in conjunction with surgery and/or radiation therapy, in the case that the malignancy has spread to undetectable locations in the body. Because chemotherapy is most commonly used in addition to other treatments, it can be referred to as an adjuvant therapy. Chemotherapy may also be used to shrink tumor size before surgery (neo-adjuvant therapy), or to shrink tumor size to decrease tumor effects (such as a large tumor obstructing an airway). Chemotherapy may also be used in late-stage lung cancer to prolong life.

In lung cancer, chemotherapy is used as an adjuvant therapy, before and/or after
surgery, and is sometimes combined with radiation therapy. Lung cancer treatment with chemotherapy usually uses a combination of 2 or more drugs, and is given in cycles of 3-4 weeks, usually 4-6 times. Chemotherapy agents can be given orally or intravenously. Cisplatin and carboplatin are two commonly used chemotherapy drugs to treat lung cancer. These platinum-containing agents will bind to DNA and trigger apoptosis (cell
death). It is common for patients to develop a resistance to these agents over
time.

Radiation therapy: Radiation therapy, also called radiotherapy, uses high-energy radiation targeted in specific areas of malignancy to kill or shrink tumors. The radiation will damage the DNA of the cells and lead to cell death. Radiation therapy is often combined with chemotherapy and/or surgery to treat SCLC and NSCLC. Two types of commonly used radiation therapy are external beam radiation therapy and internal radiation therapy
(brachytherapy)
. Research into other brachytherapy protocols, such as the implantation of radioactive seeds next to malignancies in the lung (which has been successful in prostate cancer treatment), is currently underway.

External beam radiation therapy: a machine emits high-energy radiation targeted towards the area of treatment.

Internal radiation (brachytherapy) therapy: in lung cancer, brachytherapy can be administered by passing radioactive material through a plastic tube inserted into the lung where the malignancy to be treated is (this is done via bronchoscopy).  

Prognosis and outcome

Of all diagnosed cases of lung cancer, 10% are ultimately cured. If a patient cannot be cured by surgery at the time of diagnosis there exists a 50% chance of survival for one year. 85% of all lung cancers diagnosed are in stage II or higher (NSCLC), or in extensive stage (SCLC).

One-year survival rate is 41% for lung cancers diagnosed in this stage (stage II or higher or ES), and the five-year survival rate is approximately 15% (compared to approximately 65% for colon cancer and approximately 90% for breast cancer). If lung cancer is diagnosed before it has spread to the lymph nodes, the five-year survival rate increases to about 42%, although less than 20% of all lung cancers are diagnosed at this early of a stage. Most noticeable symptoms of lung cancer do not present themselves until after metastasis has occurred.

Factors
influencing prognosis:

Stage

Location of tumor

Type of lung cancer

Response to certain
treatments

Patient’s relative health

Patient’s age

 

 

References consulted

Hansen, H. (Ed.). (2008)Textbook of Lung Cancer (2nd Edition), London, Informa Healthcare.

American Cancer Society

U.S. National Library of Medicine (NIH), Medline Plus

World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer

Journal of the American Medical Association, Lung Cancer Facts

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, MicroRNA signatures in tissues and plasma predict development and prognosis of computed tomography detected lung cancerMattia BoeriCarlaVerriDavide Conte, Luca Roz, Piergiorgio Modena, Federica Facchinetti, Elisa CalabroCarlo M. Croce, Ugo Pastorinoand Gabriella Sozzi, 2011.

 

Take CE exam on this article and earn 1.0 Continuing Education Credit 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Catching It on the Bounce: Stanford Hospital responds to online posting of patient data

By Paul Dow, BS, RT(R)(CT)

The exposure of protected health information is always a cause for concern. There are varying degrees of exposure, and there are varying degrees of response. What separates the quality of the response from good to bad is the level of accountability and responsibility an organization takes for the loss of patient data. The best response I have seen recently from an organization has come from Stanford Hospital and Clinics.

A breach of information for approximately 20,000 emergency room patients of the Stanford Hospital and Clinics website occurred between March and August of 2009, as reported by a recent New York Times article. The breach arose from the actions of a contractor who posted patient information on a publicly accessible web site. The incident was not caused by the hospital and the contractor has assumed responsibility for the event. There will be other steps taken by the hospital as the investigation continues.

What makes this situation response remarkable to me is that Stanford Hospital and Clinics has gone the extra step to provide identity theft protection to each person who had their data exposed. Although the information exposed did not include credit card or social security numbers, Stanford is going a step further to ensure that patients feel their private information will not cause them substantial damage. It also shows that Stanford is taking steps to demonstrate that they take this event seriously and that they realize that patient/customer trust is a fragile thing.

There are choices people can make. If people do not feel their information, clinical or not, is safe, then they might take their business elsewhere. In this case, the proactive choices made by Stanford seem to be the best response an organization could provide.

According to the article, a patient discovered the breach and alerted the facility. As patients become more technologically savvy, what could your organization do to ensure that in the event of a similar situation, it could win back the trust of your valuable patients/customers? Could you convince people that your facility respects their information and treats it as if it was their own?

More on author and clinical informatics educator, Paul Dow

Posted in Clinical Informatics | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Updates: Nuclear Medicine Advanced Associate (NMAA) Master Degree Program

The first NMAA exam was administered in June of this year at the SNM Annual Meeting in San Antonio, Texas. Four candidates sat for (and passed) the exam after completing an MIS (Master of Imaging Science) from the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS). Collaborating with UAMS in this advanced degree program are Georgia Health Sciences University, University of Missouri at Columbia, and Saint Louis University. This is the second MIS track to be offered from UAMS, the first being the better known, but still new, Radiology Assistant (RA) program.

NMAA candidates must first be graduates of an accredited Nuclear Medicine Technology program, and hold a Nuclear Medicine Technologist certification.

In addition to regular technologist duties, NMAAs could be responsible for:

  • ordering and administering testing agents
  • administering sedation (under supervision of a physician)
  • assessing and monitoring patients, monitor exercise and pharmaceutical stress testing procedures
  • performing therapeutic procedures (under supervision of a physician)
  • assessing patient images
  • requesting further imaging and/or ordering additional diagnostic procedures to compliment nuclear medicine findings
  • preparing preliminary reports and readings on tests
  • communicating report findings to ordering physician

Continue reading

Posted in Technologists | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Review of the FDA’s 510(k) approval process for medical devices

By Ryan Hamilton, PhD

The process by which the FDA reviews medical devices has recently come under increasing criticism. Both consumer and manufacturing groups are frustrated with the slow pace and nature of the medical device review process.

In 1938, Congress first regulated medical products for safety and effectiveness, although at the time these were mainly drugs and not medical devices. In 1976 the FDA took sole responsibility to regulate the medical device industry in the US; two competing goals were the focus: to provide the public reasonable assurances of safe and effective medical devices and to avoid overregulation of the industry. The most recent reorganization of medical device regulation came in 2002 as the Medical Device Fee and Modernization Act (MDUFMA), which was interpreted by the FDA as a shift towards the least burdensome approach to medical device approval. The FDA, and more specifically, the Center for Radiological Health (CDRH), offers two paths to approval. First, is the Premarket Approval Process (PMA), typically used for products which support or sustain human life. This process is lengthy and intensive. The second path is the 510(k) approval process, which was designed for use with lower risk products as well as changes made to existing products, or those that are substantially equivalent to previously approved products. Regardless of the approval process, the federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act requires reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness before a product reaches the market.

Recently, the 510(k) process has become burdened beyond its design. In 2009, 90% of new medical devices were approved through 510(k) and the FDA received 4,000 submissions for approval. A 2011 Archives of Internal Medicine article, by Diana Zuckerman et al., reported that of the 113 Class I recalls of medical devices (Class I is the strictest recall of a product which has the potential to cause serious health problems), 71% were approved through 510(k) while only 19% through PMA.

Concerns about the 510(k) process, its evaluation of new devices, and increased prevalence of recalls led the FDA to take a two-pronged approach in September of 2009. The FDA conducted its own internal review of 510(k) to analyze what changes could be made to improve consistency in the program, and commissioned an independent study by the Institute of Medicine (IOM).

Continue reading

Posted in Legal Issues | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Seeking Moby Dick Mo-99: Coping with the Tc99m shortage and what’s ahead

By: Ajay K Malik, PhD

Technetium-99m (Tc-99m) is the most used radioactive tracer with over 30 million tests per year done all over the world. When tagged to a pharmaceutical or biological marker, it helps evaluate, diagnose or manage cancer spread, blood flow and cardiac function; brain activity and thyroid disease; and detect osseous metastasis, fractures and infections (bone scan). Radiology professionals inject this radioisotope to gauge blood flow to the organs and detect cancer spread much earlier and with greater precision than many other methods, including PET or CT scan. Tc-99m, with a half-life of just 6 hours, is the most preferred radioactive tracer—it emits high energy 142.7 keV gamma rays, allowing very high resolution imaging without posing any danger of long-term radiation damage to the internal organs. Lately, Tc-99m supply chain has come under stress. In the January 21, 2011 issue of Science, Robert F. Service wrote that due to the 2009 temporary closure of NRU and Petten reactors and resulting shortage of Tc-99m, “physicians were forced to use less Tc-99m for many procedures, ration what scant supplies remained, and find less desirable substitutes.”

Continue reading

Posted in Nuclear Medicine, radiotracers | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Google announces the end of Google Health

By Paul Dow, BS, RT(R)(CT)

The Good and Bad of the Situation

Google has announced in their official blog that their Personal Health Record (PHR) experiment is coming to an end on January 1, 2013. If you have data entered on their site there will be enough time to safely export the data to another application. However, this announcement, like many events in life, is not all good or all bad for the average healthcare consumer. There are still many useful, and free, options for the empowered patient. Microsoft’s HealthVault is available, as well as an AHIMA version, MyPHR which can cover the needs of most, if not all, consumers. What then is lost, really, from this announcement? Not as much as you might initially think.

Continue reading

Posted in Clinical Informatics | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment